Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Impolitical post on Harper/Cadman raises a question

Once again Impolitical works as an amateur entomologist lifting the rock and identifying the creepy crawlies underneath.

Which raises a question. Since I am Not A Lawyer, are Conservative party donors in any way complicit in this attempted bribing of an MP? Even if they are not it might be a way to put a stick in the spokes of the fundraisng wheel. Most donors are probably not aware of the uses their donations put to. Just the thought might put some chill on the donation machine.

It will also help build unease with Mr. Ordinary and his closet of sweater vests.

We have to fight back in (ethical) way possible.Recommend this Post


penlan said...

Hey, that's a really interesting point. But it won't fly in any legal way. But if that thought was kept in the conscious of the Con voter/donor they just might reconsider donating.

Constant Vigilance said...

Thanks. I agree that it likely won't fly but I think we need to find ways to make Harper and the Conservative brand radioactive to Canadians and we need to start yesterday.

Actually we should have started 4 years ago.